Posted on Leave a comment

Why Has the USA Got Poorly Designed Infrastructure

a person standing alone on country road

All nations, if they are to be modern economies, require robust infrastructure that meets the needs of their age and time; during the industrial age, factories needed to be built, and roads to be maintained in cities to be constructed with the necessary infrastructure for manufacturing cities.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, England built sophisticated Riverway networks and locks throughout the country to transport coal, steel and other goods for manufacturing; this process repeated itself around the globe.

The United States has such poor infrastructure due to the period it began industrialisation in the late 19th and early 20th century. New technology was developed, including the internal combustion engine; for example, England and Europe invested their resources in the train, rivers and locks.

America chose to invest in the automobile and not trains, rivers that were predominant in the old world.

To get to the heart of America’s poor infrastructure, we must be aware of the Federal Highway Act of 1956, which aimed to build a country system of Interstate highways throughout the USA.

This highway project is one of the main reasons American infrastructure is poorly designed. The Federal Highway Act cost the United States $571 billion, and this funding primarily went to construct highways and parking spaces.

This means that American cities and suburbs are not designed with alternative public transport in mind; the United States is very much the nation of the automobile; to get to work, get groceries and move around, you must have a vehicle.

With the rise of fear of global warming and governments wanting to cut down emissions, the way American infrastructure is designed is so that it will be costly to redesign the way cities have been built for nearly a hundred years.

The United States, from the creation of the Federal Highway Act of 1956, have added nearly 50,000 miles of road or 80,000 km of road, which had over a million Americans displaced due to road construction; this burden mainly fell upon minorities within the USA.

road between green leafed trees  Infrastructure
Photo by Josh Sorenson on Pexels.com

Discrimination and Infrastructure

 The United States Housing Association Agency historically has subsidised housing construction, and during the time of discrimination and the United States, new houses being built were only four white families.

During this period, the US government marked African-American areas in red, showing that they were too risky to be insurable for mortgages.

After World War II, the Veteran Association funded housing for ex-white soldiers but not for other ethnic minorities.

In the 21st century, discrimination of the past no longer happens due to the civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s and the wins to end discrimination against African Americans.

The old development model left a massive infrastructure problem within the United States. Of the 138 million homes within the US, 68% of these are single-family houses, and due to single-family zoning, many neighbourhoods are primarily made up of urban areas.

Due to this design layout, most US citizens not living in major cities to get groceries and other essentials require an internal combustion engine or an electric vehicle.

America, the national transport is the car United States has 5% of its land mass dedicated to car parking spaces, leaving eight parking spaces for each vehicle within the United States.

The National Car Ownership Statistics states that 278,063,737 personal and commercial vehicles were registered to drivers in the U.S. in 2021. The number of registered vehicles in the United States increased by 3.66% between 2017 and 2021, indicating an upward trend in car ownership.

This means there are 2,224,509.896 car spaces within the United States of America; one positive of this is that 99% of car parking spaces within America are free.

silhouette of golden gate bridge during golden hour  Infrastructure
Photo by Mohamed Almari on Pexels.com

Sources

Forbes Car Ownership Statistics 2023 link

The Guardian The hidden climate costs of America’s free parking spaces link

Vox Why free parking is bad for everyone link

OBF The Hidden Truths of America’s Bad Design link

Social Media and Other Links

LinkedIn Link https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-riley-b463881b4/

Blog Link https://renaissancehumanism.co.uk/ 

YouTube Link https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCChWzkJjCwD37gmvugB9a_g/featured

Anchor Link https://anchor.fm/renaissancehumanism    

Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/1DXGH7dTHgYE49sdmfv1C8

My Amazon author page https://www.amazon.com/author/jonathan1997

My Twitter https://twitter.com/Jonathan5080549

My Medium link jonathanrileywriter.medium.com  

Posted on Leave a comment

Geopolitics: How British Build a Global Empire

beige cat with gold colored crown

All nations expand, die or prosper due to the environment of their geography, which we call geopolitics, which affects how policies are made and what countries can practically accomplish.

For instance, if a nation historically did not have access to coal and steel, it would not industrialise.

For England and the greater United Kingdom, made up of England, Scotland and Wales, its geography does not give a fantastic advantage that enabled the British to build the world’s largest empire ever or will ever be.

For the British Isles, half of its landmarks are mountainous, particularly in Wales and Scotland, which is why, even to this day, they have lower populations than different parts of the United Kingdom.

England’s biggest county, Yorkshire, has over 5.4 million people, a larger population than Scotland and the principality of Wales, with Wales’s population of over 3.1 million and Scotland’s population of just under 5.4 million.

Overall, the English population is over 55 million, which dominates the political union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

This is one reason why federalism will never work for the English constitution because for that system to work, England must be suppressed, according to the historian David Starkey.

This is all related to geopolitics because the much smaller population in England and Wales is because, in the case of Wales, it is much smaller than England, and both kingdom and principality are mountainous, making it much harder for agriculture.

It was not until the Industrial Revolution that the population in England reached over 6 million, and it was not until the Napoleonic wars that inflation went into two digits.

The demographic change was due to the Industrial Revolution, and the agricultural revolution of the 18th century meant that England could sustain a much larger population.

Geopolitics: British Global Empire

The Politics of Great Britain

When reading this, you may wonder why I write about England and Great Britain as two different entities; the truth of the matter is that the English constitution is not a union of nations but a union of Parliament with the act of Union in 1707.

The Scottish were given higher representation in Parliament and maintained a separate legal system based on Roman law and not English common law, an education system, a Presbyterian church and, in contrast, the Anglian Church.

This was because the Scottish nobility failed in building their colonial empire and needed England to pay off their debts.

The second reason was that the Scottish population in 1707 was around 400,000, compared to 6 million people in England.

The final reason the English were so interested in pursuing a Parliamentary union with the Scots was because, historically, Scotland was the back door and invasion route into England.

The Scots had invaded northern England before the Norman conquest in 1066 and historically allied with the French to force England to spread its resources by fighting two-front wars with France and Scotland.

On a final note, people within and without Great Britain often forget that to the rest of the world, the British are British.

Still, within the union itself, its peoples are Welsh, Northern Irish, Scottish and English, with separate histories, languages and cultures.

There is a political reckoning that needs to happen for the regions of Great Britain to understand their place within the British constitution and where they stand culturally.

The people of Scotland have a choice regarding how much they wish to be English or Scottish, which is a significant factor in the Scottish National party’s and the fight for independence for the Scots.

According to the geopolitical analyst Peter Zilhen, they have a choice to make regarding the cultural union within Great Britain.

Geopolitics: Great Britain

British Geopolitical Advantage

Within the island of Great Britain, you are never more than 70 miles away from the coast; this has historically meant that England had access to capable seamen that could be used for international trade and the defence of England.

Historically, from the Norman conquest in 1066 until the rain of England’s 1st Tudor king, King Henry VII, from 1485 to 1509, the English navy only existed as a means of transportation between the kings of England and their much richer continental holdings in France.

What this meant geopolitically was that English kings, until the rain of the Tudor dynasty from 1485 to 1603, were not interested in developing their navies to defend the English coast, which enabled during the Hundred Years War from 1337 to 1453 French armies to attack and invade English coastal cities and towns at least 50 times.

The Hundred Years War and England’s defeat in the conflict in 1453 meant that England became untethered to the European continent, and it took until the rain of King Charles II of England and the brief English Commonwealth in the 17th century for England to focus on naval power.

British policies focused on the high seas provided a quantitative and qualitative advantage for British power. For instance, Louis XIV of France’s 400,000-man army could not invade England due to security provided by the English navy that was not even 80,000 strong.

Furthermore, English sailors could fire three shots per Spanish or French gunners, effectively doubling English firepower.

As continental armies got bigger, reaching the Hundred thousand mark in the 16th century, England, with a much smaller population than France at over 25 million, was larger than Russia in the early 19th century and had the largest population in the European continent.

The British were not able to compete on the European continent or willing to invest in its land-based military due to the army being seen as a force of tyranny that suppressed the freedom of the English people, which was used by Charles I, Oliver Cromwell, King Charles II and King James II to suppress English freedoms.

What this meant for the British was that rather than pursuing continental holdings, the English opted for colonialism, control of the world seas and trade routes to enrich themselves.

The wealth extracted from England’s colonial empire could fund the enlargement of the British Navy and keep France contained to the European and African continent in the 19th century.

The English in the 18th century successfully removed French influence from North America, the Indian subcontinent and the Far East; this was possible because England was primarily a maritime power; in contrast, France was tied to the European continent.

Throughout the 18th century, France spent 45 years at War and had to maintain an army of over 400,000 and, during peacetime, at least 150,000, making France priority on maintaining its army at the expense of naval development.

Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution

The home of Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain in 1769 with the implementation of the first steam engine.

Britain would create wealth through the technology of steam and the development of manufacturing.

Historically, economics was the process of household management, according to philosopher Aristotle or the administration of limited and finite resources.

What the British could do with the Industrial Revolution was to create continuous wealth, which meant it could improve its prosperity and had the cash to finance the enemies of France, building its empire and using geographical and industrial advantages.

The British Empire was able to do this because the Empire reached the height of its power in the late 18th and early 19th century due to this process happening during the Industrial Revolution.

In contrast, the Spanish Empire built its empire from the 16th to the early 18th century with gold and silver from South America.

The Spanish bought the goods and services it needed by giving precious metals in exchange, which destroyed the European gold and silver markets and led to high inflation, and that’s how the Spanish destroyed their economy.

In contrast, the British Empire began to rise to power in the 18th century in the middle of the Industrial Revolution, which meant that its economy was based upon liberalism, free markets and the creation of wealth, which was the first time this happened in human history where peoples became more prosperous.

Since the Industrial Revolution, life expectancy, technological advancement and the ability to generate wealth through specialisation enabled the British Empire to be the first nation to industrialise, which was a massive quantitative and qualitative advantage.

Economically and in some cases literally, the British were bringing guns to a knife fight.

Posted on Leave a comment

The American Revolution to the End of the Pax Britannica

flag of america

The beginning of the end of the British Empire was not from any great rival or catastrophe or long decline being painful or wrecked with war bloodshed; the end of the British Empire came about by the hand of his children with the American Revolutionary War is from 1775 to 1883.

The end of the British Empire was almost prophesied by the Economist, philosopher, and author of The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith, in 1776, the publication of his book and his view on the end of the empire.

Adam Smith argued that colonies would betray and leave the influence of the home islands due to the pursuit of their national self-interests and that the pursuit of the empire would only weaken the home nation.

Great new technologies were also being created with the Industrial Revolution starting in 1769, the creation of the steam engine created by James Watt, though it should be highlighted that the development of technology originated from France in 1680 and eventually, through different iterations, led to the advancements made by James Watt.

The invention of machinery and technology to generate wealth from manufacturing was the first time people were freed from the burden of an agricultural economy.

In 1800 CE, 80% of people survived by farming; now, less than 2% of the UK’s population works in farming. As industrial technology spread from Britain to the rest of Europe and the world, British industry started to decline and become less competitive due to machinery becoming old.

Nations like Germany United for the first time in 1871 CE, outcompeting their British rival.

The reason for this is simple: it took the English seven generations to industrialise, which meant the British took upon the financial burden and development of the technology, while other nations that industrialised after the British followed their technology development path within England.

This is why it took the Germans five generations to surpass the British Empire.

This process repeated nation after nation until contemporary times when China reindustrialised within 40 years. That’s less than seven generations of development within less than one generation.

This is why, by the outbreak of World War One in 1914 CE, Britain’s dominance was over, with Germany and the United States of America taking over the economy and the return to total war continental wars, which had not happened for nearly 100 years.

The American Revolution to the End of the Pax Britannica

Social Media and Other Links

LinkedIn Link https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-riley-b463881b4/

Blog Link https://renaissancehumanism.co.uk/

YouTube Link https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCChWzkJjCwD37gmvugB9a_g/featured

Anchor Link https://anchor.fm/renaissancehumanism

Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/1DXGH7dTHgYE49sdmfv1C8

My Amazon author page https://www.amazon.com/author/jonathan1997

My Twitter https://twitter.com/Jonathan5080549

My Substack https://jonathanstephenharryriley.substack.com/publish/home

My Substack Subscribe https://jonathanstephenharryriley.substack.com/subscribe

My Medium link jonathanrileywriter.medium.com